|
Volume 58 1949 > Volume 58, No. 1 > The Polynesian Collection of Trinity College, Dublin; and the National Museum of Ireland, by J. D. Freeman, p 1-18
|
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 1
![]() THE POLYNESIAN COLLECTION OF TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN; AND THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF IRELAND
IN the study of Polynesian ethnology artifacts collected by Europeans on first contact, or within a few years of first contact, are of special significance. They constitute a datum in terms of which the material culture of neolithic Polynesia is to be defined, and subsequent changes in form and technique calculated. It is important that all such artifacts should be located and described. The purpose of the present paper is to give a preliminary account of the exceptionally fine Pacific collection of Trinity College, Dublin (now housed in the National Museum of Ireland) which hitherto has escaped the attention of students of Polynesian ethnology. The information I have to record was collected during a brief visit to Eire in September, 1947. The Trinity College collection contains a number of pieces which were acquired on the second and third voyages of Captain James Cook. Methodologically it is of great importance that the origin of ethnographical specimens be documented as fully as possible. Not infrequently this is a formidable task, and most of my time was spent in tracing the history of the collections under review, both in the archives of Trinity College and in the National Library of Ireland. Inasmuch as the Trinity College collection is likely to excite the interest of Polynesian ethnologists, and to be the subject of more detailed examination in the future it is proper that such evidence as I have been able to unearth should be stated in full. HISTORY OF THE TRINITY COLLEGE COLLECTION.
The first of the two collectors with whom we are concerned is James Patten, who sailed as a Surgeon in the Resolution on Cook's second voyage of discovery accomplished in the years 1772-1775 (7, Vol. 1, p. xxix). 1 James - 2 Of Patten's opportunities as a collector and his keen curiosity in the manners and products of the peoples of the South Seas some hint is given by the younger of the two Forsters. George Forster describes, for example, the excursion into the country which was undertaken by Mr. Patten, Lieutenant Clerke and himself when the expedition visited Easter Island. (14, Vol. 1, p. 577.) Unfortunately I have not been able to find Patten's own Journal. 3 That he kept one is certain, for Sir John Pringle in his paper entitled “A Discourse upon some late Improvements of the Means for Preserving the Health of Mariners,” read to the Royal Society on November 30, 1776, mentions that he had been favoured with the sight of Mr. Patten's Journal, and quotes some of Patten's observations on the treatment of sea-scurvy. The Resolution arrived back in England in the summer of 1775—anchoring off Spithead on July 30. Within less than a year Cook had sailed once more for the Pacific, but - 3 This resolution fully establishes one source of the Dublin collection. Patten was rewarded for his gift. An entry in the Register of Trinity College dated August 2, 1780, records that “On the 31st of July it was agreed upon to grant an Honorary Degree of Doctor of Physick to James Patten.” The second collector who contributed Polynesian pieces to the Trinity College Museum was Captain James King, R.N., the distinguished author of Vol. III of the narrative of Cook's third voyage. Captain King was the son of the Rev. James King (b. 1713). The Rev. King, who was educated at Cambridge, became Chaplain of the English House of Commons. In 1772 he was appointed a Canon of Westminster, but four years later he exchanged this position for the Deanery of Raphoe in the County of Donegal, which he occupied until his death in 1795. This fact has an important bearing on our story. Captain James King was born at Clitheroe, Lancashire, in 1750. He entered the Navy at the age of 12, and following service on the Newfoundland Station was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant in January, 1771. In 1774 he spent some time in Paris, and - 4 The first documentary evidence of King as well as Patten having presented specimens to Trinity College is contained in a little book entitled The Picture of Dublin for 1811, and published in that year. The Trinity College collection is described in these words: “The Museum is a beautiful room 60 feet by 40 feet, furnished with a collection of Irish fossils and a variety of curious and exotic natural and artificial productions among which is a very good collection of curiosities from the South Pacific Ocean and the North-West Coast of America, presented by Dr. Patten and Captain King, which make a very conspicuous figure. A chief mourner's dress of Otaheite displays much taste mingled with barbarity, and the one of the naval warrior merits attention. There is also a quantity of the various cloths made from the barks of trees in the different islands of the South Seas and fishing nets well executed. The rich cloaks and feathers with the war-like weapons and drums and other instruments of music will not be passed by un-noticed.” (16, p. 91.) - 5![]() This account of 1811 is an important one, for no catalogue of the Trinity College Museum has survived. Another early reference occurs in An Historical Guide to Dublin, which appeared in London in 1821. The author, the Rev. G. N. Wright, writes of the “very curious collection brought from the South Sea Islands, and presented to the University by Dr. Patten.” (24, p. 41.) The Dublin Penny Journal of October 16, 1835, gives a fuller description: “Trinity College Museum: Case No. 1, contains Ornaments from the Marquesas, Friendly, and Sandwich Islands, New Zealand and Otaheite; No. 2, Otaheitian Dresses and Models; No. 3, New Zealand Articles of Dress and Implements; No. 4, Shells ...; No. 5, Cloak made of Feathers from the Sandwich Islands ...” (II.) Again, W. B. S. Taylor, in his History of the University of Dublin, published in London in 1845, mentions the “large collection of dresses, implements of war, and others for domestic purposes used by the South Sea Islanders, the greater part of which was collected by Lieutenant Patten, R.N., whilst he was circumnavigating with Captain Cook.” (22, p. 297.) In 1844, Robert Ball, LL.D., was appointed Director of the University Museum, (12, p. 152 seq.) a post which he held until his death in 1857. In a report issued in January, 1846, Dr. Ball describes the Trinity College Museum as containing “a considerable collection of garments, personal ornaments, tools, etc., of various countries, many of which were collected on Cook's last voyage.” 5 Further details are contained in Dr. Ball's answers to twenty-nine questions concerning the Museum which were put to him by the Dublin University Commission of 1853. Dr. Ball describes the foundation of the Trinity collection following Patten's presentation of 1777—which still formed part of the University Museum. He notes that there was “no general - 6 In 1868 the desirability of transferring the ethnographical specimens in possession of Trinity College to a National Museum was discussed by the Science and Art Commission, but no action was taken until December 14, 1881, when W. E. Steele, M.D., Director of the Science and Art Department of the National Museum (founded 1877) wrote to the Registrar of Trinity College: “Understanding that the Provost and Senior Fellows of Trinity College possess a number of interesting objects collected by the late Captain Cook, a portion only of which are exhibited, it has occurred to me that probably the Provost and Senior Fellows would not object to present to, or deposit in, this Museum the collection in question. Should they see fit to assent to this proposal it would give me great pleasure to have the objects properly arranged, labelled, and placed in the Ethnographical Section of the Museum of which it would naturally form an important part.” (6, p. iii seq.). The Rev. Thomas Stack, D.D., Registrar of Trinity College, replied in a letter dated February 15, 1882. He announced that the Board of Trinity College proposed to present to the National Museum the “Cook Collection of Miscellaneous Articles (Clothing, etc. Connected with the Polynesian Islands).” This material was handed over in 1882 and 1885, and is listed in the Registers of the Science and Art Museum for those years. For some obscure reason none of the clubs, spears and other weapons belonging to Trinity College were deposited in the National Museum until some years later. Following further correspondence in which special conditions were laid down and agreed to, the Trinity College “Collection of South Sea Weapons” was transferred in July, 1894. Mr. Buckley, an Assistant on the Staff of the Science and Art Museum was given the task of identifying these new specimens, which “with very few exceptions possessed no labels.” It so happened that Mr. Edge-Partington visited Dublin while this work was in progress, and he was able to devote a day to “checking Mr. Buckley's - 7 In the tables that follow I have listed the Polynesian collection of Trinity College as shown in the Registers (for the years 1882 and 1885) and the Catalogue (for the year 1894) of the Science and Art Museum. During my brief stay in Dublin it was not possible for me to locate all of the Trinity College specimens in the display cases of the National Museum. The descriptions given (except for one or two minor corrections) are those which appear in the Registers and Catalogue mentioned above. The specimens have been grouped in geographical areas: (1) Polynesian specimens presented to the Science and Art Museum by the Provost and Senior Fellows of Trinity College in 1882:
![]()
(2) Polynesian specimens presented to the Science and Art Museum by the Provost and Senior Fellows of Trinity College in 1885:
(3) Polynesian specimens deposited in the Science and Art Museum by the Provost and Senior Fellows of Trinity College in 1894:
![]()
In 1894 the Provost and Senior Fellows of Trinity College also deposited in the National Museum a number of specimens from Fiji (52 pieces), New Caledonia (3 pieces), the New Hebrides (25 pieces), the Solomon Islands (12 pieces), and New Guinea (49 pieces). The Fijian collection is of particular interest for it is known to have been made by Professor Harvey, of Trinity College, during a visit to the Fiji Islands in about the year 1855. It consists for the most part of clubs and spears. The specimens arrived in Dublin in July, 1856, and in November of the same year (about two months after his return) Dr. Harvey delivered an address to the members of the Dublin University Zoological and Botanical Association on the Fiji Islands. The Chairman (Dr. Robert Ball) opened the meeting with these words: “Tonight Professor Harvey favours us with some remarks on the inhabitants of the Fiji Islands, whose arms, etc., you see hung around the room. Collections of this kind have been sneered at but very improperly as a right knowledge of them is of great importance in the very difficult and very high study of ethnology; a study in - 10 COMMENT.
As already noted, no catalogue of the Trinity College Museum has survived. A few specimens still retain labels which, though undated, are clearly of great age. Several are almost certainly those affixed when the specimens were first acquired. In the majority of cases however, there is no documentary evidence to enable us to identify with certainty the pieces actually collected by Patten and King. On all of Cook's voyages the collecting of “curiosities” seems to have been a highly popular pastime. George Forster in his narrative of the second voyage (he sailed in the Resolution with Patten) makes frequent reference to the eagerness with which all members of the ship's company acquired specimens. He notes that “not less than ten” of the elaborate mourning dresses of Tahiti “were purchased by different persons on board and brought back to England.” (14, Vol. 2, p. 72.) Captain Cook himself presented one of these dresses to the British Museum, and Reinhold Forster another to the University of Oxford. 6 A Tahitian mourning dress is also one of the features of the Trinity College collection. In all probability it is one of the ten mentioned by Forster, and was brought back by James Patten. Objects from the South Seas aroused the greatest of interest in 18th century Europe. Omai, as Fanny Burney's Diaries attest, was the toast of London, and articles manufactured by “the Indians” were in keen demand. One mourning dress brought back to England by a seaman on Cook's second voyage was sold for the sum of “five and twenty guineas.” (14, Vol. 2, p. 75.) Private collections presented to institutions of learning undoubtedly earned - 11 Patten's collection, it is reasonable to conclude, must have been a considerable one, for it was large enough to prompt the Board of Trinity College to found a special Museum, and to set aside a “great room” to house it. Of the size of King's contribution (which included objects from Hawai'i and the north-west coast of America) it is more difficult to form an opinion, but it must have appreciably increased the size of the collection, and in 1790 a Keeper to the Museum was appointed. The Register of Trinity College records that on June 29, 1792, further “curiosities from the South Seas” were received—this time from the Dublin Marine Society. These also must have been collected on one of Cook's voyages. Further evidence of the size and nature of the collections presented by Patten and King is contained in Gregory's description of 1811. (16, p. 91.) The Trinity College Museum we are told then occupied a “beautiful room 60 feet by 40 feet,” and Patten and King's “very good collection of curiosities” made a “very conspicuous figure.” The Trinity College collection, containing as it does many specimens dating from the second and third of Cook's voyages, is clearly worthy of detailed study. In the time available to me in Dublin it was impossible to make even a cursory examination of all of the Polynesian pieces possessed by the National Museum. I was able however, to arrange for some of the more important pieces to be photographed. In the notes that follow, each object photographed is briefly described and commented upon. The numbers given refer to the Registers (1882, 1885, etc.) and the Catalogue (1894) of the Science and Art Museum, Dublin—now the Irish Antiquities Division of the National Museum of Ireland. The first fifteen figures are of specimens which in all reasonable certainty were collected by Patten and King. Where a label is attached to a specimen describing it as belonging to the “Cook Collection” this fact has been mentioned. The other objects I have taken the precaution of describing as: “Probably Cook Collection.” - 12![]() The last five figures are of specimens collected at a later period, which I have thought worth including to show the merit of the general Polynesian collection of the National Museum of Ireland. The Hawaiian carved figure (No. 1607/80) is an especially vigorous and stimulating piece of work, of an unusual form and a fairly early period, worthy of inclusion in any monograph on Polynesian art. The Austral Islands paddle (part of the Trinity College Collection) must be one of the most beautifully carved specimens in existence. The ceremonial adze from Mangaia (also from the Trinity College Collection) is of Class 2, as defined by Sir Peter Buck (5, p. 382 seq.). It is note-worthy for the great length of its shaft, and for its beautifully polished and notched head. This notched ornamentation is a rare feature. There is a similar specimen in the British Museum (B.M., No. 7374); and Professor Giglioli (27, p. 300) mentions two other adzes with notched ridges: one in the Archaeological Museum of St. Germain near Paris, and the other in his own collection. Finally, I should make it clear that this paper purports to be no more than a preliminary report on the Polynesian collection of the National Museum of Ireland. It is to be hoped that at some time in the future the Dublin collection will receive the detailed study it deserves. This paper will then have served its purpose. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE.
In August of this year (1948) while on a climbing holiday in Switzerland, I was able to visit the Historisches Museum in Berne, and examine the Ethnographical Collection made by Johan Weber, the official artist on Cook's third voyage. This collection, which consists predominantly of specimens from Polynesia, is an extensive one, and would well repay detailed study by students of Polynesian material culture. In the brief time at my disposal I was able to examine only those objects in the display cases. The following lists will give some idea of the scope of the Polynesian collection. TAHITI.
Small drum, bamboo flute, bark-cloth dress, head-dress and frontlet of mourning dress, strings of beads, gorget, matting, eye-shade, fly-flapper, basket, bonito lures, fish-hook, tattooing implements and mallet, coconut shell cups, hafted adze (quadrangular). - 13![]() TONGA.
Baskets, strings of beads, combs, wooden head-rest, pan-pipes, spatula, clubs, matting garments, conch-shell. NEW ZEALAND.
Jade adzes, bone cloak pins, bone whistle, stone mere, wooden mere, taiaha. HAWAI'I.
Feather cloak, helmet (with feathers), feather head-band, matting, sling and stones, pig-tusk armlet, turtle-shell armlet, necklets, shark-tooth weapons, pounders, bowls, fish-hooks. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
I am greatly indebted to Dr. M. Quane, Administrative Head of the National Museum of Ireland (Irish Antiquities Division), for the kindness he showed me and the facilities he placed at my disposal during my stay in Dublin; to Mr. A. T. Lucas, M.A., Officer in Charge of the Folklore Collections of the National Museum of Ireland for much practical assistance; to Mr. Edward F. Tuke, the Museum Photographer, for his excellent photographs; and to Dr. Kenneth C. Bailey, Registrar of Trinity College, for making available to me the University Records. I have also to thank Dr. H. D. Skinner, Director of the Otago Museum, New Zealand, for advice and criticism. LIST OF OBJECTS APPEARING IN PLATES.
FIGURE 1.
No. 3906/82. Chief mourner's dress, Tahiti. Labelled “Cook Collection.” George Forster's contemporary description (14, Vol. 2, p. 72 seq.) is worthy of quoting: “This remarkable dress consists of a thin flat board of semi-circular form, about two feet long and four or five inches broad. Upon this are fixed four or five chosen mother of pearly shells, by means of strings of coco-nut core passed through several holes which are pierced in the wood and in the edges of the shells. A larger shell of the same kind fringed with bluish-green pigeons' feathers, is fixed to each end of this board, of which the concave margin is placed upwards. Upon the middle of the concave margin there are two shells, which together form nearly a circle about six inches in diameter; and on top of these a very large piece of mother of pearl, commonly with its purple coating on is placed upright. It is of an oblong shape enlarging rather towards the upper end, and its height is nine or ten inches. A great number of long, white feathers from the tropic bird's tail, form a radiant circle around it. From the convex margin of the board hangs down a tissue - 14 (cf.: 7, Plate XVIV; 10, Vol. 1, Plate 27, 4, Fig. 152.) FIGURE 2.
No. 190/85. Wooden figure, Tahiti. Height 8 inches. Probably Cook Collection. (cf.: 10, Vol. 1, Plate 24, Nos. 7, 8 and 9.) FIGURE 3.
No. 188/85. Gorget, Tahiti. Labelled “Cook Collection.” (cf.: 4, Fig. 155; 10, Vol. 1, Plate 28, No. 3; 18, Plate 20, No. 327a.) - 15![]() FIGURE 4.
No. 3637/82. Drum, Society Islands (?) (On left hand side of plate.) Labelled “Cook Collection.” Height, 51 inches; diameter at base, 9 inches; diameter at top, 5frac12; inches; lower 20 inches carved; 12 protruding, rectangular, carved knobs; double tautening braids. No. 3636/82. Drum, Society Islands?) On right hand side of plate.) Labelled “Cook Collection.” Height, 50½ inches; diameter at base, 8 inches; diameter at top, 4½ inches; lower 22 inches carved; 10 protruding rectangular carved knobs; double tautening braids. These two drums are of a type usually ascribed to the Austral Islands. If, however, they are correctly labelled as belonging to the Trinity College “Cook Collection” (they are so entered in the Museum Catalogue for the year 1882), they must have come from the Society Islands. There is some evidence to support this possibility. In his account of 1811, Gregory (16, p. 91) mentions “drums and other musical instruments” as forming a part of the collections made by Patten and King. Although Cook discovered Tubuai, one of the Austral Group, on his third voyage, no landing was made, and the natives refused to approach closer than “about the distance of a pistol-shot” when the ships shortened sail. No “curiosities” were collected. Furthermore, in two of Weber's plates illustrating Cook's third voyage (8, Plate 25, “A human Sacrifice in a Morai in Otaheite”; and Plate 28, “A Dance in Otaheite”) drums of a closely similar type to those under discussion are shown. Again Ellis, in his Polynesian Researches (13, Vol. 1, p. 282), figures two Tahitian drums which fall into the same class. Some observations made by Skinner (20, p. 309) in his discussion of two drums in the Oldman Collection are worthy of note in this respect: “An interesting point suggested by these drums is that the decorative scheme followed in the Austral and Hawaiian Islands would appear to be derived from a common ancestral scheme ... If this suggestion of a common ancestor to the decorative motives of the Australs and the Hawaiian Islands is correct, the theoretical common ancestor must be sought in the long-extinct decorative art of the Tahitian Islands. At present there is not, as far as I know, any direct evidence of such a theoretical ancestor.” Although it is by no means finally conclusive, such evidence as does exist suggests that the two drums (above) of the Trinity College Collection, came from somewhere in the Society Islands. (cf.: 8, Plates 25 and 28; 10, Vol. 1, Plate 15; 13, Vol. 1, p. 282; 18, Plates 17 and 18.) FIGURE 5.
No. 3640/82. Drum, Tahiti. Labelled “Cook Collection.” Height, 16 inches; diameter, 10 inches. FIGURE 6.
No. 194/94. Hafted adze, Society Islands. (On left.) Length of adze, 6½ inches; maximum width, 2⅝ inches. No. 196/94. Hafted adze, Society Islands. (In centre.) Length of adze, 5⅝ inches; maximum width, 2⅛ inches. - 16![]() No. 195/94. Hafted adze, Society Islands. (On right.) Length of adze, 8 inches; maximum width, 2⅛ inches. All three specimens probably Cook Collection. FIGURE 7.
No. 3682/82. Gorget, Marquesas Islands. Plaited sinnet. Probably Cook Collection. (cf.: 7, Plate 17; 10, Vol. 1, Plate 45, No. 3.) (Note: The Trinity College Collection also includes a gorget of wood (badly damaged) from the Marquesas Islands.) FIGURE 8.
No. 3647/82. Wooden head-rest, Tonga. Length, 26 inches; height in centre, 5 inches. Probably Cook Collection. (cf.: 21, p. 44, Plate XI.) FIGURE 9.
No. 286/94. Club, Tonga. (On left.) Length, 3 feet 9¾ inches; length of head, 1 foot ¾ inches; end of head, 5½ inches by 1⅜ inches; head lozenge-shaped in section, carved with parallel lines arranged in geometrical sections, handle decorated with squares of incised lines arranged in chequer pattern. No. 406/94. Club, Tonga. (In centre.) Length, 5 feet 2½ inches; maximum width of blade, 4¾ inches. No. 298/94. Club, Tonga. (On right.) Length, 4 feet 9½ inches; maximum width of blade, 5½ inches. (Blade damaged and repaired.) All three specimens probably Cook Collection. FIGURE 10.
No. 197/94. Hafted adze, New Zealand. Greenstone blade; length, 11¼ inches; maximum width, 2⅝ inches; maximum thickness, 7/16 inch; pierced at poll. Labelled “Cook Collection.” (Collected on second or third voyage, probably at Dusky or Queen Charlotte Sound.) FIGURE 11.
No. 3655/82. Flute, New Zealand. Length, 17 inches. (On left.) No. 3654/82. Flute, New Zealand. Length, 20 3/10 inches. (In centre.) No. 3656/82. Flute, New Zealand. Length 16 inches. (On right.) Probably Cook Collection. (Hamilton (17, p. 418, Plate LVIII, Fig. 1) figures a doubleflute from the British Museum, remarking: “As far as I know this is a unique specimen.” In addition to the Trinity College specimen (above) there is also a double-flute in the Oldman Collection (19, Plate 27, No. 31).) FIGURE 12.
No. 3664/82. Shark-tooth knife, Hawai'i. Length of wooden handle, 10 3/5 inches; width, 2½ inches. Labelled “Cook Collection.” - i![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This specimen is especially interesting, for on one side of it is gummed an old and discoloured paper label bearing (in an 18th century hand) the following inscription: “A knife of the Sandwich Islands; with a knife of this kind Captain Cook was cut to pieces.” FIGURE 13.
No. 191/84. Necklet, Hawai'i. Length of hook, 4 inches. Probably Cook Collection. FIGURE 14.
No. 3686/82. Helmet, Hawai'i. Probably Cook Collection. FIGURE 15.
No. 3662/82. Bowl, Hawai'i. Probably Cook Collection. This specimen has an old paper label affixed to it (in an 18th century hand) bearing the inscription: “A Yava Bowl of Sandwich Islands; N.B. the natives have no tools to manufacture with but shell and stone.” FIGURE 16.
No. 1606/80. Wooden figure, Hawai'i. Height, 14 inches. Presented to the National Museum of Ireland by the Royal Dublin Society in 1880. FIGURE 17.
No. 1607/80. Wooden figure, Hawai'i. Height, 24 inches. Human hair attached with nails. Presented to the National Museum of Ireland by the Royal Dublin Society in 1880. FIGURE 18.
No. 290/94. Ceremonial paddle, Austral Islands. Presented to the National Museum of Ireland by Trinity College, Dublin. Length, 3 feet 7 inches; diameter of handle, 1¼ inches. FIGURE 19.
No. 373/94. Ceremonial adze, Mangaia. Presented to the National Museum of Ireland by Trinity College, Dublin. Length, 6 feet 1½ inches. FIGURE 20.
No. 373/94. Ceremonial adze, Mangaia. Detailed photograph of 19 (above) showing lashing and notched ornamentation. The shoulder of this adze (not shown in photograph) is also notched. REFERENCES.
![]()
1 In this and subsequent bibliographical references, the number preceding refers to its place in the list at the end of the paper, where full particulars are given.
2 This information was supplied to the Director of the Science and Art Museum, Dublin, in 1894, by a Miss Jenkin, who referred to James Patten as her mother's paternal grandfather. (6, Preface.)
3 I have searched without avail for Patten's Journal at Trinity College, Dublin; the National Library of Ireland; the Public Record Office, London; the Department of MSS. of the British Museum; the Admiralty; and the Royal Society. It is not listed in the N.S.W. Public Library's Bibliography of Cook. 1928.
4 This resolution was acted upon. The Register of Trinity College records that in 1790 Dr. Barrett was appointed Keeper of the Museum. I am informed by Dr. Kenneth Bailey (the present Registrar) that Dr. Barrett was a famous Fellow of Trinity. He was an Orientalist and a Biblical Scholar, and also became Librarian of the magnificent Trinity College Library.
5 It is possible that the specimens collected by James King on Cook's third voyage were not presented to Trinity College until after his death in 1784. Dr. V. Ball (Director of the Science and Art Museum) writing in 1894 states: “I have been informed by the Rev. Dr. Haughton that he was told by the late Dr. Robert Ball that some portion of the Cook Collection had been received by Trinity College through the Rev. Mr. King, a relation of Lieutenant James (afterwards Captain) King who accompanied Captain Cook on board the Resolution on this third and last voyage, and took command after Cook was murdered.” (6, Preface.)
6 Reinhold Forster also presented many other ethnographical specimens to the University of Oxford. They are now housed in the Pitt-Rivers Museum, having been transferred there from the Asmolean in 1886.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||